P. v. Briceno
Jose Alfredo Briceno appeals a judgment arising out of his conviction of possession of cocaine for sale and possession of marijuana for sale. He contends that the trial court erred in (1) denying his request to continue his trial to permit him to call as a witness a codefendant who had pleaded guilty and, in so doing, claimed sole responsibility for the charged offenses and (2) refusing to admit the codefendant's plea statement into evidence. Court reject Briceno's arguments and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Briceno