In re D.N.
The court found true count 1 of the juvenile wardship petition that minor possessed a knife on school grounds. (Pen. Code, 626.10, subd. (a).) Minor was declared a ward of the court and placed on probation. On appeal, minor contends (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the juvenile courts true finding; and (2) there is a discrepancy between the clerks transcript and the reporters transcript as to condition No. 10 of minors probation and, regardless of which version is accepted, the condition does not meet the standard put forth in People v. Lent (1975) 15 Cal.3d 481, 486 (Lent), superseded on another ground by Proposition 8 as stated in People v. Wheeler (1992) 4 Cal.4th 284, 290-292.
On appeal, minor makes two contentions. First, minor asserts there was insufficient evidence to support the courts finding that he possessed a knife on school grounds. Specifically, minor contends there was a lack of substantial evidence to prove (1) he had knowledge the knife was in his possession; and (2) he knew the length of the knife blade exceeded two and one-half inches. Minors second contention is that the discrepancy between the reporters transcript and the clerks transcript concerning probation condition No. 10 should be resolved in favor of the clerks transcript. However, regardless of which version of the probation condition prevails, minor contends condition No. 10 is invalid under the standard put forth in Lent, supra, 15 Cal.3d at page 486.
Court find that probation condition No. 10 is related to future criminality and, therefore, does not violate the standard put forth in Lent, supra, 15 Cal.3d at page 486.The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on In re D.N.