In re James W.
In these proceedings for dependent child James W., Sandra S. (mother) appeals an order of November 18, 2005, denying a modification petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, 388) in which, acting pro se, she sought to set aside/Dismiss all CPS and Court involvement in this case. Her appointed counsel on appeal does not attack that ruling on the merits, but claims error in the court having granted mother pro se status a year earlier, shortly before the court terminated her reunification services. Court find ourselves without jurisdiction to review the earlier orders and, lacking any showing that self representation prejudiced mother here, affirm the denial of modification.
Comments on In re James W.