In re Tiffany M.
Mother, father and the siblings (James and Stacey) appeal from an order of the juvenile court terminating parental rights for Tiffany and B. following hearings under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] Collectively, appellants contend there was no substantial evidence to support the juvenile courts finding that the parental relationship exception of subdivision (c)(1)(A), the child veto exception of subdivision (c)(1)(B) and the sibling relationship exception of subdivision (c)(1)(E) did not apply to the facts of this case. Mother separately argues that if a child over 12 is ambivalent about being adopted, the court must find that the child is presently not adoptable and refuse to terminate parental rights. Finding no error, Court affirm.
Comments on In re Tiffany M.