legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Equihua
Defendant Augustine Equihua appeals a no-contact order imposed as a condition of his six year prison sentence following a conviction of one count of forcible rape. (Pen. Code, 261, subd. (a)(2).) Equihua contends the no contact order violates his right to due process because the order was unauthorized and exceeded the jurisdiction of the trial court.
The no contact order is stricken and the judgment is otherwise affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale