In re E.S.
Edgar S. (father) appeals from the judgment of February 8, 2007, declaring his daughter, E.S., a dependent of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300. He contends substantial evidence does not support the sexual abuse allegation sustained under section 300, subdivisions (b) and (d). He further contends that if the record does not support the allegation, the orders removing E. from his custody and requiring father to participate in sex abuse rehabilitation services should be reversed. As substantial evidence supports the findings, Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re E.S.