legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jose V.
Jose V., a minor, appeals from a disposition order providing that he remain a ward of the juvenile court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602,[1]be placed in the care, custody and control of the probation officer and remain in the home of his parents subject to conditions, including the condition that he spend 80 days in juvenile hall. This order followed the sustaining of a section 777 petition revoking probation previously granted after appellant admitted an allegation of possessing graffiti tools (Pen. Code, 594.1, subd. (e)(1)). The evidence adduced at the section 777 hearing was as follows:
Court have examined the entire record and are satisfied that appellants attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issues exist. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.) The order under review is affirmed.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale