P. v. Garcia
Defendant David Garcia appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence. A jury convicted Garcia of two counts of robbery and found true the allegation that Garcia reasonably should have known that the victim of one of the robberies was 65 years of age or older. After the jury found him guilty, Garcia admitted to having suffered a prison prior, a serious felony prior, and a strike prior. Court conclude that Garcia's challenges to his conviction are without merit. Further, under recent Supreme Court precedent, the trial court did not violate Garcia's right to a jury trial when it imposed the upper term. The conviction and sentence are therefore affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Garcia