legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Angel T.
.L. (Z.) appeals a judgment terminating her parental rights to her minor sons, Angel T. and Andrew L. (minors), under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. She contends the court erred by denying her section 388 petition for modification seeking to have the minors returned to her custody. Z. also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court's findings that the beneficial parent child relationship exception did not apply to preclude terminating parental rights under section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A). E.R. (E.), Angel's father, also appeals and joins in Z.'s arguments concerning Angel. Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale