P. v. Thoreson
Defendant and appellant Steven Alan Thoreson appeals from a judgment entered after a guilty plea and an admitted violation of probation. He contends the judgment should be reversed because (1) his July 8, 2004, prospective waiver of custody credits was not knowing, voluntary and intelligent; (2) the prospective waiver of custody credits on July 8, 2004, was imposed by the court as a matter of routine in violation of People v. Penoli (1996) 46 Cal.App.4th 298 (Penoli); and (3) his April 20, 2005, waiver of custody credits did not apply to credits he received while in the Pate House residential treatment program. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Thoreson