legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Escamilla
A jury found defendant and appellant Manuel Alfredo Escamilla (defendant) not guilty of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, 245, subd. (a)(1)[1]), but guilty of the lesser included offense of simple assault ( 240). The jury also found defendant not guilty of vandalism. ( 594, subd. (a).)[2] The trial court placed defendant on probation for three years under various terms and conditions including the condition that defendant serve 60 days in county jail, with 20 days of presentence credit consisting of 14 days of actual custody credit and 6 days of conduct credit. The trial court imposed a $20 court security assessment ( 1465.8, subd. (a)(1)), and a $200 restitution fine ( 1202.4, subd. (b)), and a suspended $200 probation revocation restitution fine ( 1202.44).
On appeal, defendants appointed counsel filed an opening brief in accordance with People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 requesting this court to conduct an independent review of the record to determine if there are any arguable issues on appeal. Court have reviewed the record and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale