P. v. Holbrook
This is an appeal by Benjamin Holbrook in two criminal cases. In the first case (SCD 187211), he contends the court did not orally pronounce sentence, and the abstract of judgment and minutes reflect a sentence encompassing a strike that was previously dismissed. The People respond that the court orally pronounced a sentence that did not include the strike, but concede that the abstract of judgment and the minute order must be corrected to delete references to the strike. We agree with the People and accordingly remand the case to the sentencing court so that it may make those corrections. In the second case (SCD 195927), Holbrook contends the judgment must be reversed because the record does not show that he personally waived his right to a jury trial. The People properly concede he is correct, and Court reverse the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Holbrook