P. v. Barling
Defendant Joseph Terrence Barling appeals following his conviction of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 211), with personal use of a firearm ( 12022.53, subd. (b)), while released from custody on another offense ( 12022.1). Defendant contends (1) his assertion of rights under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694] was improperly used against him at trial; (2) an involuntary admission was improperly used at trial; (3) an emergency room doctor was improperly allowed to testify on forensic issues upon which he did not qualify as an expert; and (4) the prosecutor committed misconduct. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Barling