In re Elizabeth W.
Appellant Emma H. (mother) appeals from an order implementing a permanent plan of guardianship over her daughter, Elizabeth W. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26.[1]) Mother raises two contentions on appeal: (1) the court and respondent Kern County Department of Human Services (Department) failed to comply with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. 1901 et seq.) requiring remand with directions for the juvenile court to comply with ICWA; and (2) the juvenile courts visitation order must be reversed because it gives her daughter sole discretion over whether visitation occurs. Court affirm.
Comments on In re Elizabeth W.