P. v. Smith
Robert Arthur Smith appeals a judgment arising out of his pleas of guilt to multiple drug-related offenses in two separate criminal proceedings (SCD192500 & SCD195612). He contends that the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence seized by police during unlawful searches of his home and relied upon by the prosecution as the basis for the charges in SCD195612; and (2) imposing a consecutive sentence on one of the counts in SCD192500 in violation of Blakely v. Washington (2004) 542 U.S. 296. Court agree with Smith's first contention and reverse the judgment as to the counts charged in SCD195612 on that basis. In all other respects, Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Smith