P. v. Malin
Appellant Curtis Lee Malin contends his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was abridged when the trial court refused to allow him to discharge retained counsel. Court agree and reverse the conviction.
P. v. Malin
Appellant Curtis Lee Malin contends his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was abridged when the trial court refused to allow him to discharge retained counsel. Court agree and reverse the conviction.
Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.
Comments on P. v. Malin