legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Williams
This is defendants second appeal in this matter. In his first appeal, case No. E033166, defendant appealed from his convictions for robbery (Pen. Code, 211)[1](count 1), unlawful taking and driving of a vehicle (Veh. Code, 10851, subd. (a)) (count 2), and evading a peace officer (Veh. Code, 2900.2, subd. (a)) (count 3) and from the true findings on the enhancement allegations that defendant was armed with a firearm during the commission of the robbery ( 12022, subd. (d)), that defendant had sustained two prior strike conviction ( 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subd. (a)-(d)), and that defendant had suffered one prior prison term ( 667.5, subd. (b)). He claimed, inter alia, (1) the prosecutor committed misconduct, and (2) the trial court erred in failing to stay the terms imposed for counts 2 and 3 pursuant to section 654. In that appeal, we found that the terms imposed on counts 2 and 3 should have been stayed pursuant to section 654 and rejected the remaining contentions on appeal.
Court reject this contention and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale