legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Rodgers
After a jury trial, defendant was found guilty of first degree residential burglary. (Pen. Code 459.) The jury also found that during the commission of the burglary, another person, other than an accomplice, was present in the residence. ( 667.5, subd. (c)(21).) Defendant was sentenced to two years in state prison. On appeal, defendant contends his conviction for first degree burglary must be reversed because there is insufficient evidence to support a finding that the structure he entered was an inhabited dwelling, due to the evidence that the victim was in the process of moving out of the home at the time of the burglary. Court direct the superior court clerk to correct the abstract of judgment to reflect that a jury found defendant violated section 667.5, subdivision (c)(21). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.155(c)(1).)

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale