Aloha Trading v. Despras
Despras demurred to the Aloha complaint which the trial court granted without leave to amend. We find a substantial factual question regarding the effect of the addendum upon the request of Aloha for the second five year option, and reverse the judgment. A trial of the claim of Aloha could find that Desprass denial of the application of Aloha to extend the five year term violated the terms of the first addendum, entitling Aloha to compensatory damages for the refusal. Court reverse the case. The case is reversed.
Comments on Aloha Trading v. Despras