legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Hanssler v. Eskanos & Adler
Defendant Eskanos & Adler, P.C. appeals from the denial of its motion to strike the complaint of plaintiffs Hayley Hanssler and Scott W. Hanssler under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (anti-SLAPP motion; all further references are to this code unless otherwise stated). It contends the court erred when it concluded resolution of the underlying lawsuit mooted the motion. Court agree. In addition, because the issue of whether defendant would be entitled to recover attorney fees should it prevail on the motion was not before the court, it should not have been a basis for denying the motion. Court reverse the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale