P. v. Carranza
A jury convicted Javier Jose Carranza of burglary. Carranza entered an apartment through a window, and he stole money and jewelry from one of the bedrooms. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred by failing to give a unanimity instruction. Specifically, he maintains that because the trial court instructed the jury that the burglary could have been committed by one of two distinct entries (entry into the apartment or entry into the bedroom), the trial court was required to instruct the jury it must unanimously agree on which entry constituted the burglary. Court find his contention lacks merit and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Carranza