In re C.O.
In this appeal, mother, Gladys C., challenges the September 12, 2006 order, adjudicating her daughter, C., now 17, a dependent pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivisions (b), (c) and (d).[1] She also challenges the disposition order of September 26, 2006. Mother argues that substantial evidence does not support the findings that: (1) she could reasonably have known of C.s sexual abuse by mothers tenant; (2) no reasonable means existed to prevent removal from mother under section 361, subdivision (a); and (3) she was unable to properly address C.s problems. Consequently, mother argues that the disposition order, which removed C. from her custody, is not supported.
Court find substantial evidence supports the orders, and affirm.
Comments on In re C.O.