legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gochez
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of one of two counts in the charging information, namely, being a felon in possession of a firearm. (Pen. Code, 12021, subd. (a)(1).) On appeal he contends that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury with CALCRIM No. 3406 regarding mistake of factin this case regarding whether appellant, at the time he possessed the firearm, was under the mistaken belief that it was inoperable. Court agree with the trial court that this instruction was not required and hence affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale