legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Winzer
Lacy Winzer (Winzer) appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence after a jury found him guilty of robbery and petty theft with a prior. (Pen. Code, 211/212.5, subd. (c), 484/666.) He contends the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on battery and assault as lesser included offenses of robbery, and by failing to instruct explicitly that robbery requires a nexus between the force exerted and an intent to steal. Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale