legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Kevin S.
Gina P. and Kevin S., appeal a judgment terminating their parental rights to their son, Kevin S., Jr., and orders denying their Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petitions. They contend the court abused its discretion by denying their petitions without hearings. They also assert the court erred by finding the section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A) exception to adoption did not apply. Gina, joined by Kevin, additionally contends the court denied her due process by preventing her from cross examining the social worker about her visitation and erred by ruling the doctrine of equitable estoppel did not apply. Court affirm the judgment and orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale