P. v. Minard
Lee Frederick Minard, II, appeals a judgment after the court revoked his probation following his conviction for robbery (Pen. Code, 211)[1]with findings that he personally used a deadly weapon ( 12022, subd. (b)(1)), and had a prior serious felony conviction ( 667, subd. (a)(1)). We conclude, among other things, that 1) the probation revocation hearing complied with due process standards, 2) there was substantial evidence that Minard violated his probation conditions by using drugs, and 3) the court did not abuse its discretion in revoking his probation and sentencing him to state prison. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Minard