Lai v. Little
Mary Sue Little (seller) appeals the trial courts decision after a bench trial that her claims of breach of contract, rescission, and cancellation were time barred. She argues there is no evidence to support the trial courts finding that all of the contractual obligations of David Lai (buyer) were due on October 11, 1999, and that the court erred in determining the statute of limitations began to run on this date. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Lai v. Little