legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Milton C.
Milton C. appeals an order setting his maximum period of confinement (Welf. & Inst. Code, 731) after the court had sustained petitions (Welf. & Inst. Code, 602) finding he committed vandalism (Pen. Code, 594, subd. (b)(2)), possessed tools for vandalism ( 594.2, subd. (a)), committed burglary ( 459), battery ( 243.2, subd. (a)), made false statements to police officers ( 148.9, subd. (a)), escaped from custody (Welf. & Inst. Code, 871, subd. (d)), committed grand theft ( 487, subd. (a)), unlawfully took a vehicle (Veh. Code, 10851, subd. (a)), and violated probation conditions. This is Milton's second appeal. In his first Peo. v. Milton C. (May 25, 2006, B182169 [nonpub. opn.]) Court concluded the court erred by determining only one of the two maximum periods of confinement required by Welfare and Institutions Code section 731 when it committed Milton to CYA. Court reversed and remanded for the court to decide the proper confinement period. On remand it determined that period to be nine years two months. Court conclude that the court did not have to order a supplemental social study. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale