P. v. Floyd
This matter comes to us on remand from the California Supreme Court, with directions to vacate [our] decision and to reconsider the cause in light of People v. Crandell (2007) 40 Cal.4th 1301 [Crandell] . . . . In our earlier opinion, we concluded that imposition of a $525 drug program fee plus penalty assessment pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 11372.7 did not violate the terms of the negotiated disposition and accordingly affirmed the judgment. (People v. Floyd (Jan. 10, 2007, A114159) [nonpub. opn.].) No supplemental briefs have been filed.
Having reconsidered the cause in light of Crandell, Court again affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Floyd