P. v. Datu
On July 15, 2005, defendant pleaded no contest to one felony count of grand theft (Pen. Code, 484, 487, subd. (a), count one),[1] one felony count of access card forgery ( 484f, subd. (b), count two), three felony counts of unauthorized use of personal identifying information of another person ( 530.5, subd. (a), counts three, seven and eight), one felony count of vehicle theft (Veh. Code, 10851, subd. (a), count four), one felony count of issuing a check with insufficient funds ( 476a, count five), two felony counts of forgery ( 470, subd.(a), counts six and 11), one felony count of petty theft with a prior ( 484/666, count nine), one felony count of obtaining telephone or telegraphic services by fraud ( 502.7, subd. (a)(1), count 10), and two misdemeanor counts of falsely reporting a crime ( 148.5, subd. (a), counts 12 and 13). Defendant admitted that she had a prior strike conviction ( 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12), and had served two prior prison terms ( 667.5, subd. (b)).
In exchange for her no contest pleas, defendant was promised her maximum sentence would be 12 years in state prison. However, the court would consider a Romero motion at the time of sentencing.
Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, Court have reviewed the entire record and have concluded there is no arguable issue on appeal, including appellate counsel's possible issue referred to pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (87 S.Ct. 1396).[4] Pursuant to People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, Court provide "a brief description of the facts and procedural history of the case, the crimes of which the defendant was convicted, and the punishment imposed."
Comments on P. v. Datu