legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Thomas H.
Appellants Heather H. (mother) and Robert H. (father) appeal from the juvenile courts orders, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26,[1] terminating their parental rights with respect to their son, Thomas H. (now three years old). Mother contends (1) the juvenile courts findings that the sibling, parent child, and other family members relationship exceptions to adoption did not apply were not supported by substantial evidence, and (2) the juvenile court failed to require and consider an adequate assessment report before terminating parental rights. Father joins in the arguments raised by mother, and also contends (1) his constitutional and statutory rights to notice were violated when the juvenile court failed to ensure he was properly renoticed regarding the continued section 366.26 hearing, and (2) the order terminating his parental rights must be reversed because the court never made a finding that he was an unfit parent. Court affirm the juvenile courts orders.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale