P. v. Navarro
Oscar Navarro appeals from his conviction of two counts of first degree murder with special circumstances and one count of attempted murder. He argues that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing testimony from a gang expert regarding the mental state of a gang member in the appellants position, and in telling the jury that it was perceptive in finding an issue raised by the evidence. Appellant also challenges imposition of additional terms for use of a firearm and the decision to stay lesser firearm enhancements. Finally, he argues that a parole revocation fine was improperly imposed. Court conclude that the parole revocation fine must be stricken; in all other respects, Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Navarro