legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Alexis M.
In this juvenile dependency matter, the mother of two children appeals from the termination of parental rights (Welf. & Inst. Code, 366.26)[1] and from the denial of her petition under section 388 to modify existing orders terminating reunification services. She contends that the court abused its discretion in denying her section 388 petition and that the exception provided in section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A), applied here to prevent termination of her parental rights, because the evidence showed she had an ongoing beneficial relationship with her children. Court reject these contentions and affirm the judgment terminating parental rights.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale