In re Christopher G.
Jesus A. (Father) appeals from the termination of his parental rights from a Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 hearing. , Father appears to be raising two issues on appeal:
1. The juvenile court erred by failing to make findings under section 361.2, subdivision (a) that he was entitled to custody of Christopher Z. (Minor).
2. The termination of Fathers parental rights without a finding that he was an unfit parent violated his federal due process rights.
Court find no error. Hence, Court affirm.
Comments on In re Christopher G.