In re Soliz
This matter, a petition for writ of habeas corpus by inmate James Jaime Soliz, protests the deduction of 30 days of work/behavior credits as a disciplinary matter. Having reviewed petitioners initial petition to this court, Court issued an order to show cause returnable before the superior court. That court conducted proceedings and eventually denied the petition. Petitioner then again sought habeas corpus relief from this court, arguing that the superior court had erroneously denied the petition in part due to the ineffectiveness of appointed counsel.[2] We denied the petition, but our Supreme Court granted review and returned the case to this court with directions that we issue an order to show cause directing respondent the Director of Corrections and Rehabilitation to demonstrate that there was some evidence to support the finding that petitioner committed a serious rules violation on May 28, 2003. Court have done so. Having again examined the record in detail, Court find that the evidence was insufficient to satisfy the legal standard and that the findings and actions of respondent must be overturned.
Comments on In re Soliz