legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Conley
A jury found defendant Robert Lindsey Conley guilty of 36 counts charging various sex offenses involving his daughter H. and stepdaughter K. (Pen. Code, 261, subd. (a)(2); 261.5, subds. (c) & (d); 288, subd. (a); 288a, subds. (b)(2), (c)(2); 288.5; unspecified statutory references that follow are to the Penal Code.) The jury also found true charged special allegations. ( 667.61, subd. (b); 1203.065, subd. (a); 1203.066, subd. (a)(7).)
Defendant appeals, contending that imposition of the upper term on count 24 violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution under Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. [166 L.Ed.2d 856] (Cunningham). Court disagree and affirm the judgment.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale