legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Brian K.
Brian K. appeals from a judgment declaring him a ward of the juvenile court and committing him to the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ), formerly known as the California Youth Authority (CYA).
Defendant contends that the juvenile court erroneously determined that his theoretical maximum term of physical confinement was 10 years 10 months.[2] Relying on Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. [127 S.Ct. 856, 166 L.Ed.2d 856] (hereafter Cunningham), defendant contends that the juvenile court erroneously computed the theoretical maximum term by using the upper term of six years for the base term. He also contends the juvenile court did not expressly exercise its discretion under section 731, subdivision (b), by imposing the upper term. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in determining appellants theoretical maximum term of physical confinement to be 10 years 10 months. Court affirm the judgment.


Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale