legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Craig G.
Appellant, the mother of minors Craig, Jenna, Erick and Brian, appeals from the disposition findings and order declaring the children dependents within the meaning of Welfare and Institutions Code section[1]300, subdivisions (b) and (j) and removing the children from her custody. The juvenile court placed Craig and Jenna with their respective fathers and terminated jurisdiction as to them. Craigs father lived in Arizona. The court placed Erick and Brian in foster care and ordered reunification services for appellant. Appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to justify the order removing the children from her custody, the finding reasonable efforts had been made to prevent removal or the order for monitored visits and that the juvenile court failed to consider the detriment to Craig and Jenna in placing them with their respective fathers. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale