In re Troy B.
Nancy B., the mother of Troy B., appeals from the order at disposition hearing in which the court ordered visitation between Nancy B. and her son to be monitored by a therapist in a therapeutic setting, yet made no provision for the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) to pay for the monitor-therapist or an order for department- paid-for conjoint counseling for Nancy and her son. Nancy B. argues the reunification services were legally inadequate and that the visitation order violated Welfare and Institutions Code section 362.1. As Court explain, the court did not abuse its discretion in failing to order conjoint counseling. In addition, sufficient evidence in the record supported the courts finding that a therapist was needed to monitor the visitation and that Nancy had the means to pay for it. Court therefore affirm.
Comments on In re Troy B.