P. v. Vallarino
A jury found defendant Daniel Corrales Vallarino guilty of two felony counts of first degree residential burglary and misdemeanor possession of burglary tools. Defendant argues the trial court erred by imposing an upper term of imprisonment for one of the burglaries. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the aggravating factors cited by the court and also contends the imposition of the upper term violated his right to a jury trial enunciated in Cunningham v. California (2007) 549 U.S. [127 S.Ct. 856] (Cunningham). Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Vallarino