legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Sheridan
Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of conspiracy to commit theft and willfully injure or destroy any object or thing of archaeological or historical interest or value (Pen. Code, 182, subd. (a)(1), 484, subd. (a), 622 1/2; count 1) and resisting an officer. ( 148, subd. (a)(1); count 3.) He was sentenced to a prison term of 16 months for conspiracy and a concurrent jail term of 60 days for resisting arrest.
On appeal he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and claims prejudicial instructional error, evidentiary error, evasion of the statute of limitations, and cumulative error.
Court find no prejudicial or cumulative error and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale