P. v. McNeally
Dion McNeally appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, of three counts of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, 212.5, subd. (c)). He challenges the conviction on count 3, arguing that the trial court failed to respond adequately to two of the jurys questions during deliberations. Appellant additionally contends the trial court erred in imposing the upper term sentence. Court reject these contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. McNeally