legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Hames v. Citi Properties
Defendant Citi Properties I DE, LLC (Citi) appeals from the denial of its special motion to strike plaintiff Kelly Hamess complaint as a strategic lawsuit against public participation pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 (the anti-SLAPP statute). Although the trial courts order does not state the grounds for denying the motion, the tentative ruling to which it adhered indicated that the court did not consider Hamess complaint to be based on protected activity, and that even if it were, Hames made a prima facie showing that she would prevail in the action. Court disagree with both conclusions and shall reverse.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale