P. v. Moon
We appointed counsel to represent defendant Gi Jeon Moon on appeal. Counsel filed a brief setting forth a statement of the case. Counsel did not argue against her client, but advised the court she found no issues to argue on his behalf. Court provided defendant 30 days to file written argument in his appeal. He has filed a letter, translated from the Korean language, asserting various grievances. Court have examined the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Finally, defendant asserts he has learned that one cannot be punished doubly based on two charges from one case. He suffered only one conviction and one punishment. Court have found no other arguable issues. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Moon