legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bryant
In 2005, defendant pled guilty to being an ex-felon in possession of a firearm. (Pen. Code, 12021, subd. (a)(1).)[1] He was granted probation. A petition to revoke his probation was filed in 2006. While this matter was pending, the trial court declared a doubt as to defendants competency and suspended proceedings. ( 1368.) Two alienists were appointed, who examined defendant, and after considering their reports, the trial court declared defendant to be competent and reinstated proceedings. At the conclusion of the contested revocation of probation hearing, the trial court found defendant to be in violation of the terms of his probation that he break no law and not possess drug paraphernalia. It sentenced him to prison for the mid term of two years. Court offered the defendant an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which has been read and considered. Court have now concluded our independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.



Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale