Marriage of Saur and Uppal
Sukhdev Rye appeals in propria persona from the judgment of dissolution of marriage entered on the petition of Rajvir Uppal.[1] He contends that the trial court erred in denying his request for a continuance; in denying his request after the court took the matter under submission for a statement of decision; in computing interest on community funds at the legal rate rather than the actual return; in calculating the credit to the community for community funds he had expended on legal fees; and in imputing an earning capacity to him. Court reverse the judgment and remand to the trial court for a determination of limited issues. Given the nature of his arguments, Court do not need to relate many of the facts to which the parties testified. Court therefore not include a separate summary of the facts, and instead incorporate the pertinent details in the Discussion where relevant.
The portion of the appeal from the order denying the request for a statement of decision is dismissed.
Comments on Marriage of Saur and Uppal