P. v. Chafford
Demetrius Chafford appeals from a judgment entered after a jury convicted him of first degree murder. (Pen. Code, 187, 189.) He contends his conviction must be reversed because (1) the trial court erred when it admitted evidence of his prior misconduct, (2) the court erred when it allowed a witness to testify about the meaning of certain words that were used in recorded telephone calls, and (3) the prosecutor committed misconduct during final argument. Court reject these arguments and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Chafford