P. v. Munoz
Miguel Munoz appeals his conviction by jury of home invasion robbery in concert with another (count 1), first degree burglary (count 2), false imprisonment by violence (counts 3, 6), witness dissuasion (counts 4, 7), and carjacking (counts 8, 9). (Pen. Code, 211, 213, subd. (a)(1)(A), 459, 236, 136.1, subd. (b)(1), 215, subd. (a).)[1] The jury found that appellant personally used a firearm in the commission of all such offenses. ( 12022.53, subd. (b) [counts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9].) The jury also convicted his codefendant, Henry Alvarado, of those crimes, as well as other crimes (forgery, commercial burglary and grand theft) that were not charged against appellant. The trial court dismissed the count 5 robbery charge and sentenced appellant to state prison for 32 years. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and contends that the trial court committed sentencing error. Court affirm.
Comments on P. v. Munoz