Smith v. Hatter
Appellant Virginia Smith (Smith) challenges the grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents Edwin D. Hatter (her former accountant) and Hatter & Co., CPA. She claims that the trial court erred in denying her request to dismiss three causes of action without prejudice, and that it also erred in granting summary judgment as to the remaining cause of action (for breach of fiduciary duty). Court conclude that the trial court erred in denying appellants request to dismiss three causes of action without prejudice; however, summary judgment was appropriate as to appellants breach of fiduciary duty claim. Court therefore reverse in part and affirm in part.
Comments on Smith v. Hatter