P. v. Revello
A jury convicted defendant David Desie Revello of petty theft with a prior and commercial burglary. Defendant contends that the prosecution committed misconduct and violated his due process rights by: (1) allowing certain evidence to be destroyed, and (2) arguing to the jury that this was not a Three Strikes case and that defendants prior convictions were irrelevant to sentencing. Court find no merit in these contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Revello